How does radical skepticism creep into some people’s minds when they think about textual criticism? In this last episode of Misquoting Ehrman, Dr. J provides an important distinction which demonstrates how radical skepticism does not follow from the manuscript evidence we have. Then, he...
Latest videos
In Part 5 of Misquoting Ehrman, Dr. J looks at the young Bart Ehrman’s theological reflection on the doctrines of inerrancy and the preservation & inspiration of the Biblical text. Dr. J suggests that the young Ehrman perhaps had a misconception, misunderstanding, or invalid inference...
In Part 4 of Misquoting Ehrman, Dr. J looks at the distinction between the “original” and the “earliest available form” of the text and whether Ehrman has shifted his view in such a significant way so as to cause strong skepticism. We need your support! To partner with Dr. Jaros, go to veracityhill...
In Part 3 of Misquoting Ehrman, Dr. J offers a theory as to why some Christian apologists and scholars have misunderstood Bart Ehrman’s position. One scholar in particular does a far better job at understanding Ehrman’s view from “Misquoting Jesus.”We need your support! To...
In Part 2 of Misquoting Ehrman, Dr. J reviews statements made by some Christian scholars about Bart Ehrman which, upon further examination, are inaccurate descriptions of Ehrman’s beliefs from his 2005 book, “Misquoting Jesus.” In this video, I mention two reviews responding to Ehrman’s conclusions...