How does radical skepticism creep into some people’s minds when they think about textual criticism? In this last episode of Misquoting Ehrman, Dr. J provides an important distinction which demonstrates how radical skepticism does not follow from the manuscript evidence we have. Then, he recaps the series. Did you enjoy the series? Should he do another on more of Ehrman’s material? Comment below!
We need your support! To partner with Dr. Jaros, go to veracityhill.com/donate